Connect with us

India News

Supreme Court Pulls Up Samay Raina in India’s Got Latent Case: ‘You Have Taken the Court for a Ride’; ₹10 Lakh Cost Imposed

The apex court directed comedian Samay Raina to deposit ₹10 lakh within two weeks, citing alleged non-compliance with its earlier directions in the ongoing India’s Got Latent controversy linked to the Cure SMA Foundation.

Published

on

Supreme Court Imposes ₹10 Lakh Cost on Samay Raina in India's Got Latent Case | Dainik Diary
Stand-up comedian Samay Raina faces fresh legal trouble after the Supreme Court imposed a ₹10 lakh cost in the ongoing India's Got Latent case over alleged non-compliance with earlier court directions.

Supreme Court Cracks Down on Samay Raina in India’s Got Latent Case

The Supreme Court of India has imposed a ₹10 lakh cost on stand-up comedian Samay Raina, delivering a stern message over what it described as his failure to comply with previous judicial directions in the ongoing India’s Got Latent controversy.

During the hearing, the apex court made a sharp observation, stating, “You have taken the court for a ride,” while directing Raina to deposit the amount within two weeks. The Bench also warned that failure to comply with the order could invite coercive legal action.

The matter was heard alongside petitions involving fellow digital creators Ranveer Allahbadia, Ashish Chanchlani, and the Cure SMA India Foundation, all linked to the wider controversy surrounding remarks made during the first season of India’s Got Latent.

Court Questions Compliance With Earlier Directions

The legal proceedings stem from a petition filed by the Cure SMA India Foundation, which alleged that Samay Raina made insensitive remarks regarding the expensive treatment required for Spinal Muscular Atrophy (SMA) patients and mocked an individual living with the rare genetic disorder.

During the hearing, Senior Advocate Aparajita Singh informed the court that despite earlier assurances, Raina had allegedly failed to reach out to the foundation or affected individuals.

She argued that while the comedian continued performing live shows, he had not fulfilled commitments made before the court.

Centre Raises Fresh Concerns

Representing the Central Government, Solicitor General Tushar Mehta also questioned the comedian’s conduct.

Supreme Court Imposes ₹10 Lakh Cost on Samay Raina in India's Got Latent Case | Dainik Diary


He referred to one of Raina’s recent performances, claiming that the comedian appeared to indirectly joke about the ongoing legal proceedings by mentioning the use of ‘nimbu-mirchi’ at the beginning of his new show. Although no names were mentioned, the government argued that the reference appeared to be aimed at the pending case.

ALSO READ : Who is Geni Kamki? ‘India’s Got Latent’ contestant whose viral dance video beat all of Samay Raina’s videos with 134 million views

The Solicitor General added that he chose to raise the issue only after learning that Raina had allegedly not complied with the court’s earlier directions involving the Cure SMA Foundation.

Defence Assures Court of Cooperation

Appearing for Samay Raina, his legal counsel clarified that the alleged failure to contact the foundation was not driven by arrogance or deliberate defiance.

The defence assured the Bench that efforts would be made to persuade the comedian to comply with the court’s directions and engage with the concerned organisation.

However, the Bench expressed dissatisfaction over the situation, observing that some individuals appear to believe they can avoid accountability under Indian law by remaining outside the country.

India’s Got Latent Controversy Continues

The latest order marks another major chapter in the legal proceedings surrounding India’s Got Latent, a controversy that has reignited debates over the responsibilities of digital creators, freedom of expression, and accountability on online platforms.

While the legal battle continues, Samay Raina has already launched the second season of India’s Got Latent, with fresh episodes currently streaming on YouTube and Netflix.

The Supreme Court’s latest observations are likely to keep public attention firmly fixed on the case, which continues to generate discussion across the country’s entertainment and digital content landscape.