Connect with us

Sports

BCCI Sends Strong Message To IPL Teams Over Foreign Players: ‘Availability Is Between Franchises And Players’

After several overseas stars missed parts of IPL 2026, the BCCI makes its position clear while also hinting at a bigger IPL window and possible expansion to 94 matches.

Published

on

Dainik Diary Asad 2026 06 13T174423.577
BCCI has clarified that IPL franchises must handle player availability issues directly with overseas cricketers as discussions over tournament expansion continue.

The Board of Control for Cricket in India (BCCI) has delivered a firm message to Indian Premier League (IPL) franchises regarding the recurring issue of overseas players withdrawing from the tournament or missing parts of the season.

Following multiple concerns raised by franchises during the recently concluded IPL 2026, the board has clarified that player availability remains a matter between the franchise and the contracted player, rather than something the BCCI intends to mediate.

The issue gained attention after several high-profile foreign cricketers were unavailable for portions of the tournament. Injuries and workload management affected players such as Mitchell Starc, Pat Cummins, and Josh Hazlewood, creating challenges for their respective teams. Some franchises felt the absence of key overseas stars had a direct impact on their campaigns.

The discussion intensified when Rajasthan Royals head coach Kumar Sangakkara publicly expressed disappointment over Sam Curran’s decision to skip IPL action due to injury concerns while later participating in domestic T20 cricket in England. Similarly, Punjab Kings co-owner Mohit Burman called for better coordination between cricket boards and franchises regarding player commitments.

However, the BCCI appears unwilling to take on the role of a mediator.

According to sources, the board believes franchises are responsible for maintaining their relationships and agreements with players. The existing rule remains unchanged: any overseas player who withdraws from the IPL after being purchased at the auction, without a valid injury reason, can face a two-year ban from the tournament.

The board’s stance suggests that franchises must carefully evaluate player reliability and future commitments before making significant investments during auctions.

ALSO READ : India’s New Tennis Wonder? 13-Year-Old Srishti Kiran Becomes World No. 1 And Her Journey Is Just Beginning

IPL Auction Purse Increase? BCCI Not In Favour Of A Massive Jump

While discussions about player availability continue, another topic gaining attention is the size of the IPL auction purse.

Currently set at ₹125 crore, the salary cap has grown steadily over the years. Yet, compared to contracts in global sporting leagues such as European football or the NFL, IPL earnings still have room to grow.

Despite this, the BCCI is not considering a dramatic increase in the immediate future. Officials believe many players already receive substantial financial benefits through match fees, endorsements, sponsorship opportunities, and franchise-related commercial deals.

The board’s preference remains gradual growth rather than a sudden jump in spending limits.

IPL 2028 Could Look Very Different

Dainik Diary Asad 2026 06 13T174435.723


One of the biggest developments discussed by BCCI officials is the proposed expansion of the IPL from 74 matches to 94 matches starting in 2028.

Such an expansion would require a longer tournament window. According to board insiders, the most practical solution would be to begin the IPL in the first week of March and conclude it by mid-May, avoiding disruptions caused by the Indian monsoon season.

The move could significantly reshape the international cricket calendar and may force cricket boards around the world to reconsider bilateral series scheduling.

Balancing Growth And Viewer Interest

While the IPL continues to grow as one of the world’s richest and most-watched cricket leagues, the BCCI is also mindful of viewer fatigue. Officials acknowledge that cricket’s packed international calendar, including annual ICC tournaments and franchise leagues across multiple countries, presents challenges for fans and broadcasters alike.

As discussions continue over player commitments, tournament expansion, and future scheduling, one thing is clear: the IPL is entering a new phase where franchises, players, and cricket boards will need to find a better balance between commercial success and sporting commitments.